Potensi dan Tantangan Hukum Digitalisasi Layanan Kenotariatan: Analisis Komparatif Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i2.135Keywords:
Digitalisasi; Notaris Digital; Jasa Notaris; Analisis Komparatif.Abstract
Enhancing access to notary services is a crucial aspect of law enforcement, as it clarifies legal certainty across various segments of society. This enhancement can be achieved through the utilization of digitalization, enabling the execution of notary services without the need for face-to-face interactions. This study aims to analyze the challenges of digitalizing notary services in Indonesia, using the United States as a comparison. Employing normative legal research methods supported by legislative and comparative approaches, the analysis reveals that Indonesia lags behind the United States in facilitating digital notary services, with an insufficient legal framework. This issue reflects the underdevelopment of legal frameworks in the notary field and other legal domains, which impacts the normative limitations of digitalizing notary services in Indonesia.
[Peningkatan akses terhadap layanan kenotariatan merupakan bagian penting dari penegakan hukum, dengan memperjelas kepastian hukum di berbagai kalangan masyarakat. Peningkatan akses ini dapat dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan proses digitalisasi, yang memungkinkan dilaksanakannya pelayanan kenotariatan tanpa harus bertatap muka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tantangan digitalisasi layanan kenotariatan di Indonesia, dengan menggunakan Amerika Serikat sebagai perbandingan. Dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang didukung oleh pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif, analisis penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Indonesia masih tertinggal di belakang Amerika Serikat dalam memfasilitasi layanan kenotariatan digital, dengan kerangka hukum yang masih kurang memadai. Permasalahan ini mencerminkan pengembangan hukum yang tertinggal di ranah kenotariatan, dan ranah hukum lainnya, yang berdampak terhadap batasan normatif digitalisasi layanan kenotariatan di Indonesia].
Downloads
References
Adam, I. O., & Dzang Alhassan, M. (2021). Bridging the global digital divide through digital inclusion: the role of ICT access and ICT use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 580–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2020-0114
Almuslimah, A., Ryan Bakry, M., & Yusuf, C. (2022). Kepastian Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Etika Rangkap Jabatan Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 12(2), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v12i2.2111
Andrianto, F. (2020). Kepastian Hukum dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.114-123
Bachrudin. (2015). Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia dalam Jerat Liberalisasi. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(2), 185–196. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/1428
Bannykh, G. (2021). Education And Labour Market In The Conditions Of Regional Digitalisation. Competitiveness and the Development of Socio-Economic Systems, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.10
Bungdiana, D., & Lukman, A. (2023). Efektivitas Penerapan Cyber Notary Dengan Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Notaris Pada Era Digital. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 7(1), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.4216
Caserta, S. (2020). Digitalization of the Legal Field and the Future of Large Law Firms. Laws, 9(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9020014
Datta, A. (2021). Blockchain Enabled Digital Government and Public Sector Services: A Survey. In C. G. Reddick, M. P. Rodríguez-Bolívar, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Blockchain and the Public Sector: Theories, Reforms, and Case Studies (pp. 175–195). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55746-1_8
Dias Menezes, L., de Araújo, L. V., & Nishijima, M. (2023). Blockchain and smart contract architecture for notaries services under civil law: a Brazilian experience. International Journal of Information Security, 22(4), 869–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00673-3
Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280
Donald, H. L. T. (2022). The Importance of Using Electronic Deeds to Facilitate The Service and Storage of Notary Archives. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.v22.483-498
Embang, T. F., & Sudiarti, E. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 1217–1223. https://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/914#
Ferdiana, H. R., Amirulloh, M., & Saleh, K. A. (2021). Urgensi Akta Notaris dalam Perjanjian Pengalihan Lisensi Rahasia Dagang sebagai Upaya Memberikan Kepastian Hukum Para Pihak. LITIGASI, 22(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v22i1.3883
Gusarov, K., Shchokina, O. O., Cherevatenko, I. M., Kolisnyk, O. V., & Kolomiets, Y. L. (2023). Preventive function of a notary in the legal system of society. Documenta et Instrumenta, 21, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.5209/docu.88106
Hussy, M. M., & Djaja, B. (2023). Comparison of Notary Law in Indonesia and Singapore. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(7), 2157–2163. https://iss.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/iss/article/view/443
Johnson, J. J. (2016). Signing on the Dotted Line: Legislation to Revise New Jersey’s Notaries Public Act. Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 40(2), 247–277. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sethlegj40&div=15&id=&page=
Kesuma, T. R. A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban ahli waris atas perbuatan hukum pewaris dalam perjanjian kerjasama pengelolaan SPBU. Indonesia Journal of Business Law, 1(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijbl.v1i2.1875
Koos, S. (2023). The Digitization of Notarial Tasks - A Comparative Overview and Outlook of ‘Cyber Notary’ In Indonesia and Germany. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 2(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2023v2n2.1
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 146–172. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0415
Li, D., Luo, Z., & Cao, B. (2022). Blockchain-based federated learning methodologies in smart environments. Cluster Computing, 25(4), 2585–2599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03424-y
Light, T. (2021). Data Privacy: One Universal Regulation Eliminating the Many States of Legal Uncertainty. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 65(4), 873–896.
Lightowler, M. (2014). E-commerce for Notaries in England & Wales. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 4, 41–44. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v4i0.1797
Lim, L. X., Lim, P. E., Lim, S. H., Lim, Y. X., & Oktaviandra, A. G. (2022). Hi, Let’s Meet Online! A Study of Virtual Meeting Platforms During the Pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 5(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v5i1.1432
Mahajan, J., Mahajan, R., & Singh, D. K. (2022). Metamorphosing Indian Blockchain ecosystem. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 12(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.12.1.9
Mantelero, A. (2021). The future of data protection: Gold standard vs. global standard. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105500
Mazalio, G. I. (2023). Problematika Penerapan Smart Contract terhadap Peran dan Fungsi Notaris di Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(3), 632–638. https://jmi.rivierapublishing.id/index.php/rp/article/view/198
Mondejar, M. E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H. L. B., Dubey, R. K., Esteban, J., Gómez-Morales, A., Hallam, B., Mbungu, N. T., Okolo, C. C., Prasad, K. A., She, Q., & Garcia-Segura, S. (2021). Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet. Science of The Total Environment, 794, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
Nizwana, Y., & Fransiska Duri, Y. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Legalisasi Dan Waarmeking Akta Dibawah Tangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Sarak Mangato Adat Mamakai, 5(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.36665/sarmada.v5i2.157
Noviyanti, T., & M.S., E. R. (2022). Akibat Hukum Notaris Mempromosikan Diri Di Sosial Media Instagram. Notarius, 15(2), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i2.33674
Pepy Nofriandi, Kemala Atmojo, & I Gusti Agung Ngurah. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Kepemilikan Tanah (Studi Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 445 K/Pid/2020). Jurnal Pro Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 12(1), 149–163.
Phalosa, N. A., Anwary, I., & Syaufi, A. (2022). Promosi Kegiatan Webinar (Seminar Online) oleh Notaris melalui Media Sosial dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris. Notary Law Journal, 1(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i4.32
Sidorenko, E. L., & Von Arx, P. (2020). Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: defining the correct priorities. Digital Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38044/dlj-2020-1-1-24-38
Theodos, B., & McDaniel, N. (2023). The Geography of Notaries Public.
Weiss, A. (2023). Putting Trust in Technology: A Pandemic’s Effect on Remote Estate Planning. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (AELJ), 40(3), 823–855.
Wilson, J. C. (2021). Electronic Wills: Why Would Georgia Choose to Delay the Inevitable? Mercer Law Review, 73(1), 337–364. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/mercer73&div=23&id=&page=
Yuanitasari, D. (2017). The role of public notary in providing legal protection on standard contracts for Indonesian consumers. Sriwijaya Law Review, 1(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss2.43.pp179-190
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Justitia Ferryanto, Winsherly Tan, Lu Sudirman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
