Decisions and Authority of The Religious Courts on Sharia Economic Disputes
Abstract
This article discusses one of the court products focused on the verdict. The presentation of the decision is divided into three sub-discussions, namely the understanding of court decisions, types and developments of court decisions in sharia economic cases, and legal remedies against sharia economic decisions. This article aims to find out how the decisions of Religious Courts regarding sharia economic disputes are used. The method used in this article is normative juridical, which is carried out qualitatively. The materials in this article come from laws, decisions of the Constitutional Court, decisions of the Supreme Court, books, scientific articles from journals, internet websites and so on related to the theme being studied, namely Religious Court decisions on sharia economics disputes. The data analysis technique used content analysis techniques. The results of the analysis show that the court’s decision is the final result or conclusion in written form, which is decided by a state official (judge) who is given the authority to end or settle a lawsuit because there is contention between the disputing parties in court which must be submitted in a hearing.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, A. (2014). The Settlement for Shariah Economy Disputes Within Religious Court. Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(3), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.12345/ius.v2i6.182
Al Hakim, I. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 9(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i2.3580
Burhanudin, M. (2015). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan nomor: 179/Pdt.g/2011/Pta.Bdg. Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Formil. ‘Adliya, 9(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v9i1.6157
Christiawan, R. (2018). Penetapan Pengadilan Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Hukum Pada Proses Eksekusi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.302
Erwin, Y. P. (2015). Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Pengadaan Hubungan Industrial (Juridical Study of the Execution of Industrial Relations Court). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(4), 1–21. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/421
Fatimah, I. (2013). Pemulihan Hak Akibat Eksekusi karena Adanya Putusan Peninjauan Kembali pada Perkara Perdata. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Harahap, M. Y. (2004). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hayat, R. I., & Sukardi, S. (2020). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Terkait Wanprestasi: Studi Putusan Nomor 0132/Pdt.G/2016/Pa.Stg. Khatulistiwa Law Review, 1(40), 163–181. Retrieved from https://e-journal.iainptk.ac.id/index.php/khalrev/article/view/72
Huda, K. (2018). Eksistensi Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Syariah. Badamai Law Journal, 3(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v3i2.9245
Imaniyati, N. S., Nurhasanah, N., & Adam, P. (2017). Kompetensi Pengadilan Dalam Eksekusi Putusan Basyarnas Pada Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Menuju Unifikasi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v3i1.49
Kamal, H. (2020). Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pasca Putusan MK No. 93/Puu-x/2012. Al Mashaadir: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.52029/jis.v1i1.4
KBBI Daring. (2021). Sengketa. Retrieved December 8, 2021, from https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/sengketa
Khairuddin, K. (2021). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Penganiyaan Melalui Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Aceh Singkil. Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 6(2), 130-143. Retrieved from https://www.journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/legalite/article/view/3519
Lathif, A. A., & Habibaty, D. M. (2019). Disparitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Jalur Litigasi Pada Polis Asuransi Syariah dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 76–88. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/460
Mappong, Z. (2010). Eksekusi Putusan Serta Merta (Proses Gugatan Dan Cara Membuat Putusan Serta Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Perkara Perdata). Malang: Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.
Nurhayati, S. (2016). Penguatan Peran Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/Puu-X/201. YUDISIA?: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v7i2.2157
Nurjaman, M. I., Witro, D., & Hakim, S. Al. (2021). Akad Murabahah di Lembaga Keuangan Syariah Perspektif Regulasi. Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum, 19(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.32939/qst.v19i1.896
Rasyid, A., & Putri, T. A. (2019). Kewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.256
Rasyid, R. A. (2016). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Restudiyani, R. (2018). Kedudukan Jaminan Dalam Sengketa Pembiayaan Syariah Pada Putusan Pengadilan Agama Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pranata, 1(1), 68–77. Retrieved from http://ojs.widyamataram.ac.id/index.php/pranata/article/view/72
Sarwono, S. (2011). ukum Acara Perdata Toeri dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Umam, K. (2016). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 Bagi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis dan Keuangan Syariah. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1242
Uzma, U. (2014). Pelaksanaan Atau Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Sebagai Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 44(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no3.28
Wahyudin Anugrah, M., Hamsir, H., & Anis, M. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama Makassar. Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah, 2(3), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.v2i3.18793
Witro, D., Nuraeni, N., & Januri, M. F. (2021). Classification of Aqad in Sharia Economic Law. Nurani, 21(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v21i1.8387
Yunita, A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Mediasi Pada Masa Pandemi di Pengadilan Agama Wilayah Yogyakarta. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(2), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Syakhsiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
